What happens with those who come after amnesty?

Daniel Horowitz:

One question that proponents of endless amnesty can never answer is how they ever plan to stop future waves of illegal immigration if they continue to telegraph the message that deportations are taboo.  That as long as they can reach our shores and “become part of the fabric of society,” they are here to stay.

Indeed, Marco Rubio presciently warned about this lax attitude towards enforcement when he was running for Senate in 2009:

“If you grant amnesty, the message that you’re sending is that if you come in this country and stay here long enough, we will let you stay. And no one will ever come through the legal process if you do that.”

This is why many of us believe that to the extent amnesty can ever work as a final solution, it must be preceded by a resolute determination to enforce deportations against future illegal entrants.  The Senate immigration bill, however, does just the opposite.  Aside for the fact that it will be virtually impossible to decipher all the new illegal immigrants from the plethora of those eligible for legal status, thereby ostensibly halting all deportations, this bill explicitly grants wide latitude to DHS and immigration judges to suspend future deportations.  We’ve already noted how the bill grants DHS authority to legalize current illegals who would otherwise be ineligible for RPI status “for humanitarian purposes, to ensure family unity, or if such a waiver is otherwise in the public interest.”

... 

The only thing missing from the act is their automatic Democrat Party voter registration card.  They have no plans to deport anyone ever.  They have no plans to deter future illegal immigration.