Texas redirects funding toward natural gas vehicles

T. Boone PickensImage via Wikipedia
Houston Chronicle:

Texas lawmakers showed some love this week for a bill to provide incentives for natural gas-fueled vehicles, but a similar bill at the federal level is beginning to get the cold shoulder.

The Texas Senate sent Gov. Rick Perry a bill on Thursday that will establish incentives for companies to buy natural gas-fueled vehicles and help fund fueling stations in the "Texas Triangle" linking Houston, San Antonio and Dallas-Fort Worth.

Senate Bill 20 would redirect funds from the existing Texas Emissions Reduction Program specifically toward vehicles that use natural gas. The fund replaces or retrofits heavy-duty construction equipment and other vehicles to reduce pollution.

Natural gas producers are pushing such measures across the country to expand the market for the fuel, which has been in a price slump in recent years due to ample domestic production as drillers have perfected techniques in prolific shale formations.

"This legislation will foster the development of a Texas Clean Transportation Triangle by increasing the number of natural gas refueling stations and replacing the heaviest fuel-hungry diesel trucks with natural gas-powered trucks, thus improving Texas' air quality and economy," said James Hackett, CEO of Anadarko Petroleum Corp. and chairman of America's Natural Gas Alliance.

But in Washington, the "Natural Gas Act" pushed by billionaire Texas oilman T. Boone Pickens has lost a few of its key Republican sponsors. It would provide a tax credit to cover as much as 80 percent of the cost of buying a natural gas vehicle.

...
Most of the opposition in Washington is one of form over substance. The form of the legislation cuts against the move to simplify the tax code. I would fund it by redirecting funds from the EPA to infrastructure for making the natural gas vehicles viable. Conversion to natural gas is a long term solution to importing less oil and is therefore a vital national security issue as well as one that dramatically improves our balance of trade. It would create jobs too.
Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more