Obama's bullet train to bankruptcy

Shinkansen 700T train head at Kaoshung depot, ...Image via Wikipedia
David Hirsanyi:

...

How do we deal with this daunting future? Obama says that "none of us can predict with certainty what the next big industry will be or where the new jobs will come from." And by "none of us," he means you. Because Obama proceeded to give a speech that laid out exactly what needs innovating, which sectors will be innovative, where new jobs will be found and how we are going to get to those jobs. Can you say high-speed rail? The president can. He mentioned railroads six times, because how else are we going to win the 19th century back?

Actually, this fixation with building an extraordinarily expensive, outdated and tax-funded rail system is a great example of why central planning undermines progress.

By the time the president's promise of high-speed Internet for everyone comes to fruition, we'll probably be teleporting like Sulu. But at the very least, let's not re-fight the battles of the early 20th century. Someone already invented airplanes and cars, which, unlike trains, can be pointed in any direction we want, whenever we want, as often as we want.

...
While I borrowed the headline from Sarah Palin, I think Hirsanyi also puts his finger on why the US has not already built high speed rail. It is not likely to take us to where we want to do and it diverts resources from transportation that will. Then there is the spending that he want in spite of the election results that said voters wanted less spending. Obama is hoping to inspire to greater spending by talking about a 1950's satellite launch by the Russians. While that launch did inspire some engineering by the US to put a man on the moon it is unlikely to inspire us go go back to the future on steel rails.

Speaking of rails, the US Navy is having some success with rail guns that can launch shots at the enemy without chemicals. They can also be used to launch jets and UAVs from carriers. Someday they might be used to launch people into orbit. That is a rail project that has much more potential than trains stuck on a track on earth.
Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

  1. tommybarrett2:25 PM

    I would have to agree. Reno has especially been hard with Obama's policies and bankruptcy is becoming more and more popular.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more