Supreme Court overturning leftist judges
...
The Supreme Court has decisively intervened five times to overturn rulings from Democrat-appointed district court judges, delivering a series of wins for the Trump administration. These decisions, grounded in procedural clarity, signal a judiciary pushing back against overreaching lower courts that have sought to hamstring the president’s authority. From immigration to federal funding, the high court’s actions affirm the administration’s ability to govern without undue interference from activist judges.
The Supreme Court’s rulings sidestepped the substance of the disputes for now, focusing instead on procedural flaws in the lower courts’ orders. Issues at stake include weighty matters like immigration enforcement, the president’s power to remove agency officials, and the allocation of taxpayer dollars. By dismantling restrictions imposed by district judges, the justices have cleared a path for the Trump administration to pursue its policies unimpeded, at least for the moment.
John Malcolm, director of the Meese Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation, offered insight into the court’s motivations. “I think that the recent spate of Supreme Court decisions blocking lower court rulings against the Trump administration indicates that a majority of the justices are growing tired of district court judges issuing broad rulings, often in the form of nationwide injunctions, when they lack jurisdiction and are equally concerned about these judges ordering agencies to disburse millions, if not billions, of taxpayer dollars that will be impossible to recoup if the government ultimately prevails,” he told reporters. His analysis points to a judiciary increasingly skeptical of lower courts overstepping their bounds.
On Wednesday, Chief Justice John Roberts issued a temporary hold on orders forcing the reinstatement of two ousted agency leaders, Cathy Harris of the Merit Systems Protection Board and Gwynne Wilcox of the National Labor Relations Board. This move allows President Trump to exercise his prerogative to remove officials who may not align with his administration’s vision. Roberts’ order highlights the executive’s authority to shape federal agencies, a cornerstone of Trump’s governance strategy.
...
This points out the irrational opposition to Trump policies. These Democrat judges are overreaching in a way that threatens democracy. The Robert's Court is pushing back against the extremist Democrat judges. There is no excuse for a district court judge to issue nationwide injunctions. They are clearly over their skis.
Comments
Post a Comment