Biden's 'green light' for Iran attack on Israel

 Stephen Kruiser:

...

The Biden administration continues to insist that the official stance towards Israel hasn't changed at all. After months of parroting the "Pity the poor Gazans" rhetoric of unhinged college protesters, that all rings very hollow. 

That was before Iran did what it did over the weekend. 

Then an interesting, disturbing, and disgusting bit of news surfaced, which Matt wrote about: 

On Saturday, Iran initiated a barrage of drones and ballistic missiles at Israel. Thankfully, most of them were successfully intercepted and caused minimal damage. Of course, in a stunning move, President Biden is pushing Israel not to retaliate. It's hard to imagine why Biden would do that, except when you consider that Joe Biden has been appeasing Iran since his days as Barack Obama's vice president.

With that in mind, it's also not surprising—though it's still shocking— that Joe Biden not only had prior knowledge of Iran's assault on Israel but also technically gave it the green light under certain conditions, according to a report from the Jerusalem Post.

At this point, it's difficult to remember if Joe Biden ever was a patriotic American. Secretary of State Antony Blinken is really creating a suspicious legacy for himself too, isn't he? 

As Matt notes, the Jerusalem Post report said that the powers that be in Washington conveyed to Iran through channels that whatever it did to Israel had to be "within certain limits." If ever something merited an expletive-laden reaction, it's that line, but this is a family newsletter.  

...

Biden has been interfering with Israel's response to Hamas's mass murder attack for some time.  The left in this country also has been hammering him to do this.  Hamas deserves to be irradiated like the Nazis were.  Biden should not be interfering with Israel's response to mass murder.

See also:

NEW: Joe Biden Green-Lit Iran's Attack on Israel

And:

 HOLY CRAP: Joe Biden Approved Iran's Assault on Israel 'Within Certain Limits'

And:

 Why did some Arab countries appear to help Israel?

Some analysts saw the fact that Arab nations helped Israel and the US repel a major Iranian attack as cause for celebration. But countries like Jordan have more complicated motivations for coming to Israel's aid.

And:

 Jordan airforce shoots down Iranian drones flying over to Israel

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more