Biden backtracks on EV push

 Washington Examiner:

President Joe Biden is backtracking on unpopular environmental policies as November’s presidential election comes closer.

His administration announced Wednesday that it will impose lower auto tailpipe emissions requirements through 2029, and will not require as many pure electric vehicles to be sold.

Biden has faced pushback from automakers on EV targets, with trade groups arguing that the administration’s sales targets are impossible in the intended time frame and would risk limiting consumer choice, disadvantaging the auto industry, and pushing prices higher for all vehicles.

Republicans, including Donald Trump, the presumptive presidential nominee, are attacking the targets, saying they constitute an EV mandate would make U.S. drivers dependent on China, which controls the critical minerals supply chain for EV battery manufacturing.

The Environmental Protection Agency will press for 67% of new vehicles sold to be electric by 2032, the same as was proposed last year, but it will allow automakers to include other types of vehicles, including plug-in hybrids and improved internal combustion engine vehicles, not just pure battery powered vehicles.

Speaking on a media call Tuesday evening, Biden’s officials said the new rules for passenger cars, light trucks, and medium-duty vehicles beginning in 2027, are still the strongest-ever tailpipe reduction standards. They insisted this would help Biden achieve his goal of more than 7 billion tons of carbon dioxide reductions by 2055.

The regulations will reduce fine particulate emissions by 95% and nitrogen oxide emissions and other ozone smog precursors by about 75%, as Biden promised.

...

This a mistake that will do more harm than good.  The free market should decide what kind of vehicles are available in the US.  If EVs were better there would be no need for a mandate of them. Americans obviously are not breaking down the doors to buy one. 

See also:

Biden’s war on gas cars will cost Americans a fortune

The Environmental Protection Agency released what it calls the “strongest-ever pollution standards for cars,” which it claims will “expand consumer choice in clean vehicles.”

That’s a stretch: These new regulations, which are clearly beyond EPA’s defined powers, will limit overall vehicle choice and force Americans into expensive and unreliable electric vehicles.

The EPA expects plug-in electric vehicles to make up between 62% and 70% of the automotive market. But this unrealistic target ignores two key facts:

First, consumers are not lining up to purchase electric vehicles, which made up only 7.6% of 2023 vehicle sales despite heavy subsidies.

American drivers simply aren’t embracing EVs because they know these vehicles have shorter driving ranges and longer refueling times. Not to mention that they’re significantly more expensive.
...

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more