Google accused of rigging elections for Dems

NY Post:
Google has been putting its thumb on the scale to help Democratic candidates win the presidency in the last four election cycles, during which it censored Republicans, according to a right-leaning media watchdog.

The Media Research Center published a report alleging 41 instances of “election interference” by the search engine since 2008.

The MRC published a report accusing Google of having “utilized its power to help push to electoral victory the most liberal candidates … while targeting their opponents for censorship.”

The report comes weeks after AllSides conducted an analysis which found that news aggregator Google News skewed even more off the charts in 2023.

Google has also come under fire after its Gemini AI image generator produced “woke”-inspired and historically inaccurate images such as black Vikings, female popes and Native Americans among the Founding Fathers.

Google has denied the claims made by MRC.

Elon Musk, the Tesla CEO and X owner, chimed in on the subject with a post on his social media platform.

Musk wrote that Google “interferes to help Democrats thousands of times every election season.”

“This is to be expected when their censorship (aka ‘Trust & Safety’) teams are have far left political views,” Musk wrote.
...

According to the MRC report, Google “targeted support for Hillary Clinton for censorship” by “suspending the accounts of writers who wrote blogs critical of Obama during his primary race against Clinton.”

Four years later, Google, which “once again favored Obama over Mitt Romney,” refused to correct a “Google bomb” that smeared GOP primary candidate Rick Santorum, according to the report.

The MRC study cited data from Dr. Robert Epstein, who told Congress that Google’s search algorithm “shifted at least 2.5 million votes” to Clinton in her failed race against the eventual winner, Donald Trump.
...

In 2020, Google “targeted” Tulsi Gabbard, the Democratic congresswoman from Hawaii who was running for the party’s nomination for president, by “disabling Gabbard’s Ads account just as she became the most searched candidate following the first Democratic Party primary debate,” the MRC alleged.

A source close to Google refuted the claim, saying the company’s automated systems flagged unusual activity due to large spending changes in an effort to prevent fraud.

The matter was resolved within six hours, according to the source, who noted that Gabbard’s subsequent lawsuit against the company was dismissed.

The nonprofit went on to accuse Google of having “suppressed news sources critical of [Joe] Biden.”
...

It is hard to believe that a terrible candidate like Joe Biden could be elected in a fair contest.  He barely left his home while running and he clearly showed diminished capacity when he was running.  Trump was a much better president doing a better job of controlling inflation and not wasting billions on foreign wars.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Is the F-35 obsolete?