Congress looks to rein-in big tech

 Washington Examiner:

The Senate Judiciary Committee is just one vote away from dealing a necessary blow to Big Tech’s improperly inflated bottom line and to its ability to control the information people are allowed to see.

Senators will meet at 10 a.m. on Thursday and vote on the Journalism Competition and Preservation Act, which creates an antitrust exemption for small publishers who want to work together to make Big Tech pay them more for their content.

Google and Facebook currently exploit a monopoly in online advertising that means publishers, including the Washington Examiner, are deprived of revenues that are rightly theirs. For every dollar spent advertising online, Google and Facebook keep about half. This is why, although traffic to news sites is up 40% since 2014, their revenues are down 58%.

If small publishers are allowed to band together, Big Tech will be forced to let those who actually create news content keep more of the revenue their efforts produce.

Australia adopted a similar law last year, forcing Google and Facebook to pay news publishers over $140 million. No wonder Google and Facebook have spent millions of dollars lobbying against similar legislation here in America.

Some senators are skeptical about the bill and have raised valid concerns. Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), for example, offered an amendment this month that would prevent content moderation from being protected by the antitrust exemption. “If you’re negotiating on the ostensible harm that the bill is directed at, which is the inability to get revenues from your content, you should not be negotiating on content moderation and how you are going to censor substantive content,” he said.

We agree, as did Sen. John Kennedy (R-LA), a co-sponsor of the legislation. “I don’t have any problem with that,” Kennedy said in response to Cruz. “This just makes explicit what I thought was implicit.”

Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), a lead sponsor of the bill, also agreed with the substance of Cruz’s amendment but not its exact wording. A majority of senators on the committee clearly want small publishers to be able to keep more of the revenue Big Tech takes from them and for Big Tech not to be empowered to censor the press as a bargaining tactic. Senators just need to come up with the exact language to make that clear.

...

The big tech monopoly on content should be banned like other monopolies.  In the case of bloggers, they have virtually eliminated payment for content.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more