Democrats want to waste strategic petroleum reserve to finance EVs

 Washington Examiner:

House Democrats are seeking to turn the nation's Strategic Petroleum Reserve, an emergency store of crude oil, into an investment tool that can be leveraged to make the government money when prices are high and to fund electric vehicle infrastructure.

Rep. Frank Pallone (D-NJ) and eight Democratic co-sponsors introduced legislation on Monday that would expand the federal government's participation in oil markets, including by giving the president and Department of Energy new authorities to sell reserve oil outside of the circumstances generally provided under current law: emergencies and congressionally mandated sales.

US PETROLEUM EXPORTS HIT NEW RECORD IN FIRST HALF OF 2022

The Buy Low and Sell High Act would give the president the authority to designate a portion of the reserves as the “Economic Petroleum Reserve” and grant the Energy Department, which manages the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, the ability to sell barrels from the Economic Petroleum Reserve when oil is trading high.

This new Economic Petroleum Reserve would consist of no more than 350 million barrels of oil, and the "buy low" constraints would limit the Energy Department's purchases to domestically produced crude oil sold at $60 per barrel or below. The department would be permitted to then sell the oil when prices exceed $90 per barrel on the U.S. West Texas Intermediate benchmark.

Proceeds earned on the barrels would then be marked to help states fund more electric vehicle infrastructure.

...

This looks like another reason to vote against Democrats.  EVs should have to generate their own infrastructure.  If they were better vehicles at a better price they would be able to do it. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more