Major universities accused of price fixing

 Washington Examiner:

Sixteen major private universities, including most of the Ivy League, are facing a class-action antitrust lawsuit alleging they illegally colluded to limit financial aid packages available to students.

The lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Illinois claimed the universities “participated in a price-fixing cartel” by exploiting an antitrust exemption to which they were not entitled, the Wall Street Journal reported .

The exemption, which is outlined in section 568 of the Improving America’s Schools Act of 1994, allows universities that exclusively practice “need-blind” admissions to coordinate with one another in awarding financial aid packages to students.

The 16 colleges organized in 2003 to establish “the 568 President’s Group,” which the lawsuit dubs the “568 Cartel," to establish a “consensus methodology,” a “common formula for determining an applicant’s ability to pay” for college.

But the lawsuit said the defendant schools, which include Yale University, Georgetown University, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and the University of Notre Dame, are not entitled to the 568 exemption as a number of them do not engage in straightforward need-blind admissions.

“Under a true need-blind admissions system, all students would be admitted without regard to the financial circumstances of the student or student’s family,” the lawsuit said. “Far from following this practice, at least nine defendants for many years have favored wealthy applicants in the admissions process.”

The suit listed Columbia University, Dartmouth College, Duke University, Georgetown, MIT, Northwestern University, Notre Dame, the University of Pennsylvania, and Vanderbilt University as the nine schools that explicitly favored wealthy applicants, but it added that seven other schools, Brown University, the California Insitute of Technology, the University of Chicago, Cornell University, Emory University, Rice University, and Yale, were not entitled to the exemption because they were conspiring with the schools that weren't need-blind.
...

It looks like the universities thought they were the ones who needed a deal. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more