Democrats are turning the streets over to mobs and defunding police

Washington Examiner:
Rep. Steve Scalise shared a new ad that highlights the destruction caused by rioters in recent days, asking viewers, “Is this what you want in your town next?”
“No police. Mob rule. Total chaos. That’s the result of the Democrat agenda. Ask yourself: Is this what you want in your town next?” Scalise tweeted Sunday.
...
“People are watching all across the country when they see this mob rule, and again, you have one thing of peaceful protesting which is something that's part of our great democracy, but then this violence in the streets, it's unhinged. It's being tolerated by the Democrat leadership right now. Joe Biden has been looking the other way, and people don't want this for our country. They don't want to have this idea that if you disagree with what liberals say then you literally are canceled, and they want to yell at you, and they want to throw things at you and confront you physically, and try to burn down houses. There's no place for that in America," he said.
“Joe Biden has made, I think it's a calculated decision to look the other way, and he's bought in, by the way, to the Bernie Sanders left-wing agenda on all issues. And so, I guess on law enforcement it's no different. Look, this is going to be a big issue in this campaign. But Joe Biden, when he didn't think everybody was watching, was very clear. He said he wants to redirect money away from police. That is no different than defunding police. Anybody that tries to tell you differently, did they not even take a basic economics course? And so, the idea of redirecting or taking money away from police, especially at a time like today, I think it's concerning to most Americans. Again, this transcends political philosophy. So, Joe Biden’s bought into it. Donald Trump's made it very clear he's going to keep our community safe; he's going to stand with our good men and women in law enforcement,” he added.
...
The ads and the President's convention may have scared Biden out of his basement, but his rhetoric about the cause of the violence is disingenuous and ridiculous.  The media may try to cover for him because they hate Trump, but in doing so they further harm their own credibility.  It is like the comedian caught by his wife cheating on her who responds "it didn't happen and are you going to believe me or your lying eyes."

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more