Russia interference claim looks like another Schiff based misdirection
J.E. Dyer:
Democrats exaggerated the Russian influence operation in 2016, for which there is no evidence that it impacted the actual vote. I suspect the Democrats did this to taint Trump's victory and use it as an excuse for losing to their base. This looks like they may be getting ready to try the same scam again in 2020.
Clarice Feldman says the Russian interference claims are bunk.
New Claim About Russian 2020 Meddling To Back Trump Conflicts With Earlier ClaimIt also looks like the DNI's office went behind the President's back to give this alleged intel to the House committee run by Schiff which then leaked it to the NY Times. More digging revealed that there was no intelligence to support the allegation. It appears to be speculation by someone at the DNI's office.
Updated With Supporting Proof The NY Times Story Was Bogus
Democrats exaggerated the Russian influence operation in 2016, for which there is no evidence that it impacted the actual vote. I suspect the Democrats did this to taint Trump's victory and use it as an excuse for losing to their base. This looks like they may be getting ready to try the same scam again in 2020.
Clarice Feldman says the Russian interference claims are bunk.
Comments
Post a Comment