Avenatti gets more baggage for his presidential campaign?

Byron York:

Michael Avenatti, the lawyer for porn star Stormy Daniels, jumped into the Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court confirmation battle on the afternoon of Sept. 23. On that day, the New Yorker published the allegations of a woman named Deborah Ramirez, who claimed that a drunken Kavanaugh exposed himself to her during a party at Yale sometime in 1983 or 1984. Almost immediately, Avenatti took to Twitter with an allegation of his own.

Avenatti said he had a client, "a woman with credible information regarding Judge Kavanaugh and Mark Judge." He did not reveal her name.

Within minutes, Mike Davis, chief counsel for nominations at the Senate Judiciary Committee, sent an email to Avenatti. "You claim to have information you consider credible regarding Judge Kavanaugh and Mark Judge," Davis wrote. "Please advise of this information immediately so that Senate investigators may promptly begin an inquiry."

Avenatti responded quickly. "We are aware of significant evidence of multiple house parties in the Washington, DC area during the early 1980s during which Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge and others would participate in the targeting of women with alcohol/drugs in order to allow a 'train' of men to subsequently gang rape them," Avenatti wrote. "There are multiple witnesses that will corroborate these facts and each of them must be called to testify publicly." Avenatti supplied a list of questions Senate investigators should ask Kavanaugh, and also said he would "provide additional evidence" to the committee in the days to follow.

Of course, it wasn't true. Still, Avenatti's allegation poured fuel on an already raging partisan fire over the Kavanaugh nomination. First there was the Christine Ford allegation. Then came the Ramirez accusation, which, coming after Ford, gave Kavanaugh's opponents the occasion to claim a "pattern" of Kavanaugh's alleged abuse of women. Then Avenatti's allegation — gang rape — sent it into another dimension.
...
Avenatti also gave the committee a declaration from an anonymous "witness" who said that in 1981-1982, she personally saw Kavanaugh "'spike' the 'punch' at house parties I attended with Quaaludes and/or grain alcohol. I understood this was being done for the purpose of making girls more likely to engage in sexual acts and less like to say 'No.'"

Avenatti would not tell the committee who the "witness" was. But recently NBC reported that its journalists talked to the witness, who did not back up the declaration that Avenatti gave the committee on her behalf. "It is incorrect that I saw Brett 'spike' the punch," the woman told NBC. "I didn't see anyone spike the punch ... I was very clear with Michael Avenatti from day one."

"I do not like that he [Avenatti] twisted my words," the woman said.

Putting aside the question of why NBC waited to report the woman's statement until after the Kavanaugh vote was over. The entire Avenatti episode left Grassley angry that the publicity-seeking lawyer had hijacked the committee's time and energy at a critical time with claims that were obviously untrue. So on Oct. 25, Grassley formally referred Avenatti (and Swetnick) to the Justice Department for a criminal investigation into their conduct.
...

Avenatti is already facing IRS problems with claims of substantial back taxes owed and was recently ordered to pay millions to former legal associates.  For some reason, some Democrat campaign operatives are supposedly working with him to run for President in 2020.