Democrats think it is OK to US intelligence resources to spy on their political opponents
Kurt Schlichter:
I suspect they think it is OK because Trump is messing up their sand castles and his policies are an existential threat to their political survival. The Democrats are committed to a "resistance" to policies that look like they are working better than those pushed by the Democrat. I understand why they are sore losers, but it does not excuse resorting to tyranny to recover power. They should try new ideas and work with the Trump administration to improve government. They need to go back to trying to win elections rather than trying to overthrow an administration through a coup attempt.
Think about this – a significant portion of our country, including a majority of its elite, thinks that it’s A-OK for a Democrat administration to spy on a Republican candidate. Think hard about that. And think about whether or not we can ever put the pieces of our shattered republic back together again if we can’t even agree that using government power against our political enemies is a bad thing.There is more.
But the terrifying truth is that liberals and their Never Trump enablers actually think this kind of tyranny is a good thing. You see, they think Normal Americans are so transcendently awful (and, even more importantly, that the elite’s power so precious) that all is fair in order to stifle their opponents’ collective voice.
Yeah, I know they have reasons and excuses and elaborate theories about why it was absolutely necessary for a Democrat administration to spy on its designated replacement’s Republican opponent. And it was also totally cool for the IRS to suppress uppity Tea Party groups because they were getting to successful.
Excuses are always garbage, and theirs are garbage on fire in a dumpster. They know it. Offering them is just going through the motions. They are willing to embrace these tactics because they can.
The question all boils down to this – is it acceptable for the party in power to use the intelligence and law enforcement communities against its rivals? Are these convoluted and often delusional explanations – RUSSIANS TREASON OK NO RUSSIANS THEN UH QATARIS YEAH QATARIS TREASON! – enough to take that step, even if true?
Of course not. Even if Trump’s people sought to get the Russians to release the contents of the emails Hillary Clinton should never have had on her literally “password“ password-protected illegal server – and after two years, there’s zero evidence they did –was that enough to send spies into the campaign, to tap its phones, and leverage the power of FBI et ceterea to surveil them? Does the liberal elite have any concern that maybe, just maybe, it has to be about as serious a situation as you can get to do that? Is a coordinated campaign by the FBI backed up by the NSA and probably the CIA the proper remedy for the unauthorized release of Hillary’s yoga dates and wedding plans, because that’s all Felonia Milhous von Pantsuit said was on the 33K emails she deleted, right?
...
I suspect they think it is OK because Trump is messing up their sand castles and his policies are an existential threat to their political survival. The Democrats are committed to a "resistance" to policies that look like they are working better than those pushed by the Democrat. I understand why they are sore losers, but it does not excuse resorting to tyranny to recover power. They should try new ideas and work with the Trump administration to improve government. They need to go back to trying to win elections rather than trying to overthrow an administration through a coup attempt.
Comments
Post a Comment