Iran talks tough trying to ward off US attacks in Syria

AFP/Daily News:

A top Iranian military chief warned on Sunday that the US will face "harsh consequences" if it intervenes in ally Syria over claims of chemical attacks, Fars news agency reported.
 
"If the United States crosses this red line, there will be harsh consequences for the White House," armed forces deputy chief of staff Massoud Jazayeri was quoted as saying.

A year ago US President Barack Obama warned the use of chemical weapons in Syria would cross a "red line" and have "enormous consequences".

On Sunday, his Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel said the US military was ready to take action against Syria.

"President Obama has asked the Defence Department to prepare options for all contingencies. We have done that," Hagel told reporters in Malaysia.

"Again, we are prepared to exercise whatever option, if he decides to employ one of those options," he said, a day after Obama held a rare meeting his top aides and brass to discuss Syria.

After the meeting, Obama spoke by phone with Prime Minister David Cameron of Britain, which has accused the Syrian government of using chemical weapons on a large scale.

A statement from Cameron's office said if the use of chemical weapons by Syria would "merit a serious response" -- echoing French calls that "force" be used if the claims are confirmed.

But the Iranian military leader warned Washington, its Western allies and Israel against playing with "fire".

"The terrorist war underway in Syria was planned by the United States and reactionary countries in the region against the resistance front (against Israel)," Fars quoted Jazayeri as saying.

"Despite this, the government and people of Syria have achieved huge successes.

"Those who add fire to the oil will not escape the vengeance of the people," added Jazayeri.
...

The Iranian statement about the source of the conflict is delusional.  Obama is not nearly so clever that he could organize attacks by al Qaeda on Syria which was a former ally of the Islamic religious bigots.  In fact he has allowed the situation to deteriorate to the point where he has few good options since neither the Assad regime or the rebel groups fighting them are in the US interest.  That is what makes the Iranian statement so bizarre.

The WMD attack is still puzzling.  If Syria was winning as he claims, why would it need to make an indiscriminate attack using WMD?  If the rebels were behind the attack, why not invite the US inspectors in to study the attack?