We are paying a price for Obama's weakness and retreat

IBD:
President Bush's 2007 surge-based turnaround was one of the greatest military feats in history. President Obama's reversal of it was one of the greatest defeats, and it is emboldening the world's aggressors.

Why is Kim Jung-un, the crazed young dictator of North Korea whose best friend seems to be a freaky former NBA star, so over-the-top in threatening America with nuclear attack?

The answer can't be simple, considering the odd cult of the personality-based Pyongyang regime. But one sizeable factor undoubtedly is an attempt to diminish America's credibility in waging war.

Would we be willing to dig in for the long haul if Kim invaded free South Korea?

Does Vladimir Putin believe we would repel a Russian invasion of a strategically important neighbor?

Does China believe we would defend Taiwan?

Whatever perverse pleasure is being taken in it, Obama has seen to it that his predecessor's victory in Iraq — in which Bush extraordinarily resisted the Washington establishment of both parties to authorize the surge — ultimately ends in a U.S. failure.

...
The weakness that Obama has shown will make future conflicts more likely and one of those just might be on the Korean peninsula.   Foreign leaders have taken the measure of President Obama and they do not fear him.  He has a reputation for bluffing and backing down.  That is why Iran ignores his rhetoric.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more