Obamacare a winning issue for GOP senate candidates

Jennifer Rubin:
The National Republican Senatorial Committee is blasting out e-mails about vulnerable Democratic incumbents, calling them to account for their votes for Obamacare. A sample: “CNN’s Wolf Blitzer reported that the ‘Obama administration is conceding that some people, yes some people, will have to pay more’ for health care premiums due to ObamaCare. But Kay Hagan also misled North Carolinians on Obamacare.” (The only variation in these is the name of the embattled Senate Democrat.) Can the GOP win back the Senate on Obamacare?

Well, it is a good place to start. From the ballooning costs of insurance to the loss of the insurance you were told you could keep to the drag on employment, Obamacare is proving to be one of the most ineptly designed and counterproductive pieces of legislation in modern times. The first word of the legislation — “affordable” — was an unfortunate choice, given the reality of cost escalation.

It is of course lucky for the GOP that every Democratic senator who voted for cloture was technically the 60th vote, thus providing every competitive Republican with an easy target. What is telling is the dearth of Democratic senators at risk who seem prepared to run on Obamacare.

The 2012 election proved not to be a referendum on Obamacare in part because Mitt Romney didn’t offer a compelling alternative and in part because he chose to focus almost exclusively on the economy. But 2014 is a different matter. None of the GOP contenders will have voted for or supported Obamacare or any state version thereof. None will be focusing so obsessively on the economy to the exclusion of other issues. And none will lack evidence that even Democrats understand their legislation is deeply flawed (e.g., the lopsided vote to repeal the medical device tax).
... 
Obama's Unaffordable Care Act will be more of a defining issue in 2014, because more of the negative effects will become apparent.  That could be one reason why so many Democrats are deciding not to run for reelection.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more