Endangered feces act endangers people in Texas

Austin American Statesman:
Though they have a contract in hand, city officials are hesitant to buy land for a fire station because the federal government has proposed an endangered species listing for a salamander that calls the site home. And to some neighborhood residents, that’s good news.

In emails obtained by the American-Statesman through an open-records request, Round Rock officialsback away from purchasing the tract of land near the Tonkawa Springs neighborhood, which city studies show could be difficult and costly to develop, and even more so if the federal government determines the Jollyville Plateau salamander is endangered.

“With the recent news regarding the potential listing of the salamander … I am recommending we NOT follow through with the purchase of the tract for a fire station,” City Manager Steve Norwood told the City Council in an email sent Aug. 22, the day after the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed listing four salamander species. “It’s unfortunate, but there is too much lack of knowledge and uncertainty to spend $350k on a parcel we are not sure we can build on.”

Since Norwood’s email the City Council has voted twice to extend the contract and paid $3,000 to give themselves until November 2013 to make a decision.
... 
The Endangered Feces Act has become a danger to people when it impacts health and safety infrastructure.   It needs to be modified or repealed.  It is an anti Darwinian act to begin with.  It destroys property values for the benefit of critters of dubious value.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more