'Smart diplomacy' fails to move Pakistan

NY Times:

Frustrations Grow as U.S. and Pakistan Fail to Mend Ties


A visit by President Asif Ali Zardari of Pakistan to Chicago for last week’s NATO summit meeting underscored the mistrust and political chasms that mark an uneasy alliance.
Pakistan has become an enemy state since Obama took office.  It openly refuses to do anything about enemy sanctuaries that are the bases for attacks on Afghanistan and our troops there.  It has cut off supply lines through the country acting like a troll demanding ludicrous $5,000 per vehicle tolls to transport supplies.  In hindsight, it was probably a mistake by the Bush administration to help push Musharraf  out of office.  He at least was not a thief.

Pakistan not only will not do anything about enemy force using its territory it claims sovereignty over, while refusing to exercise sovereignty over the people attacking us.  At the same time it claims sovereignty should prevent us from striking back at the enemy.  While the government is a problem, it probably reflects the attitude of the religious bigot majority within the country.

If nothing changes, it is likely that we will be at war with Pakistan in 2014 as we try to withdraw our forces from Afghanistan.  It may mean a fighting withdrawal and the seizing of the port of Karachi in order to get our equipment out.  It something we should be planning for and we probably should let the Pakistanis know it is a possibility.  that might get them to reconsider their current intransigence.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more