More Pakistan aid cuts could be needed

The Hill:
Tensions between Islamabad and Washington again came to a boil on Monday, when Pakistan's head of intelligence abruptly canceled high-level talks with the CIA. 
The talks, slated for this week, would have been the first visit by Pakistani intelligence chief Lt. Gen. Zaheer ul-Islam to Washington, according to reports in the Washington Post. 
 Islam was scheduled to meet with CIA chief David Petraeus to discuss a slate of national security challenges facing both countries.  
But the head of Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence Directorate, scrubbed the visit due to "pressing commitments" back in Islamabad, according to a Pakistani military statement issued Monday.  
However, a top Pakistani official confirmed to the Post that the meeting was cancelled due to growing furor in the country over American lawmakers decision to slash U.S. aid to Pakistan. The Senate Appropriations Committee voted last week to cut $33 million for Pakistan, or $1 million for each year of a prison sentence given to Shakil Afridi, a doctor who helped the CIA locate al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden. 
The Senate panel also voted to block $250 million in military aid until Pakistan reopens supply routes into Afghanistan to American and coalition forces.  
Gen. Martin Dempsey, President Obama’s top military adviser, said Monday that Senate lawmakers made the right call by voting to trim aid to Pakistan....
The reaction in Pakistan suggest they have not gotten the message.  More aid and trade measures maybe required, along with negotiations with India.  Pakistan keeps backing itself into a corner with the Islamic religious bigots and away from outside supporters.  It is likely to find itself very isolated.

If aid is important to Pakistan, it will open the logistic routes into and out of Afghanistan and release the doctor. The country is looking like it is on the side of the bad guys right now and it needs to change that dynamic.  If it does not, it could find itself at war with the US if we have to force a withdrawal through Pakistan and its ports.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more