Al Qaeda losing Taliban ally?
Ray Robison:
The war against al Qaeda appears to be taking a decisive turn. Their goal has probably switched to survival mode for the next 14 months in hopes that the Democrats can bail them out.
Robison has much more in his piece. Take a look.
The signs of al Qaeda's downward spiral are accumulating. If the media were as anxious to find signs of victory as signs of failure in our war with al Qaeda, the incipient crumbling of its support in South Asia would already be noted. But of course that would require giving credit to the Bush Administration's war policies.He goes on to site this post at PrairiePundit disclosing a Taliban tribe and its leader ready to rally to our side in the war. The Taliban have taken significant casualties to both its fighters and its leaders in the past year. This is leading to even greater blunders and increased casualties for the Taliban who can't pull off an ambush without fear of being wiped out for the effort. A groups of 200 to 300 are surrounded now near Kandahar. The Pakistanis are finally putting pressure on the Taliban on that side of the border.
Already beleaguered in Iraq, where tribal leaders have turned against it, al Qaeda faces a crumbling of its tribal alliances in the Afghanistan/Pakistan borderland regions. New reporting reaffirms my belief that substantial portions of the Taliban, a tribal entity which is under the influence of the Maulana Fazlur Rahman, have turned against al Qaeda. To be sure, not every Taliban leader is going to turn, but a significant portion of them will.
The Maulana is already a target of al Qaeda, and he is working against them.
...
Faced with the looming conflict with the Maulana, Al Qaeda is concentrating its forces in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The New York Times describes a new influx of foreign fighters into Pakistan and Afghanistan. As always, the Times spins the hollowest analysis to portray defeat for the United States. But there are some questions the Times didn't bother to ask or answer, beyond the usual "the U.S. made them do it" tripe anyway. Chiefly, "why are they coming to Afghanistan"?As the Times notes, many of these new foreign fighters in Afghanistan are being placed in leadership positions within the Taliban, usually under newer, younger Taliban commanders. The article even notes that this is a somewhat "new" vs. "old" battle for Taliban leadership. The Times fails to realize the obvious, that these are al Qaeda fighters, and instead refers to them as new Taliban recruits. But the timing of this "new phenomenon" makes the reality self-evident.These fighters were meant for Iraq but the core al Qaeda leadership has realized that the war there is lost. They are no longer sending the new recruits in large numbers. In the current environment, only small teams can go unmolested in the Iraqi lands al Qaeda used to control. Since al Qaeda can no longer send large numbers of fighters to Iraq and since their Taliban support base is slipping away at home they have one option left to them.
...
The war against al Qaeda appears to be taking a decisive turn. Their goal has probably switched to survival mode for the next 14 months in hopes that the Democrats can bail them out.
Robison has much more in his piece. Take a look.
Comments
Post a Comment