The Sanchez-Pelosi alignment

Washington Post:

It may be among the strangest of political alliances: a former commanding general in Iraq, blocked from a fourth star and forced into retirement partly for his role in the Abu Ghraib prison scandal, and the speaker of the House, desperate to end a war that the general helped start.

But in partisan Washington, the enemy of one's enemy can quickly become a friend, and nowhere is that more obvious than in the new marriage of convenience between Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez.

On Saturday, Sanchez delivered the Democrats' weekly radio address. He excoriated what he called the Bush administration's "failure to devise a strategy for victory in Iraq," then embraced Democratic legislation linking continued war funding with a timeline aimed at ending U.S. combat operations by December 2008.

Other senior military figures have turned on the White House, but none as senior as Sanchez, whose command of coalition forces in Iraq in 2003 and 2004 coincided with an explosion of violence, the emergence of a brutal insurgency and a prison-abuse scandal that still haunts the war effort.

For Democratic leaders, Sanchez's address has been a triumph, covered by the media nationwide. It interrupted a stream of stories about declining violence, which had stalled efforts to force a shift of war policy.

But for critics of the war and of Sanchez's command, the radio address was curious. Andrew Bacevich, who was an Army officer in the Vietnam War and now teaches at Boston University, said Sanchez fundamentally misunderstood the nature of the conflict he faced. Sanchez's troops employed "kick-down-the-door" tactics that hardened resistance to the U.S. occupation, and helped turn an insurgency in its infancy into a guerrilla war spinning out of control, he said.

"Why he has chosen all of a sudden to attempt to return to public attention, and why he would do it in an overtly partisan way, frankly baffles me," said Bacevich, whose son was killed in Iraq. "And why the Democratic leadership would say, 'Yes, this is the guy who is going to deliver our message' is just baffling. He is a largely discredited figure."

In August 2004, when an independent panel faulted the Pentagon's top civilian and military leaders for detainee abuse in Iraq, Pelosi was one of the first to accuse the administration of a whitewash, calling for an independent commission to investigate further. The Army inspector general cleared Sanchez in 2005 of any culpability for Abu Ghraib abuse, but the issue still hangs over his head.

...

In an interview with the Monitor in McAllen, Tex., last year, Sanchez called the prison-abuse scandal "the sole reason I was forced to retire." He has said since retiring in late 2006 that he long believed that the war was severely under-resourced and strategically flawed, but that he should not speak out while wearing the uniform. He did not return e-mails yesterday requesting comment.

The sequence of events that led to Sanchez's pick began on Nov. 17, when Pelosi and Sanchez appeared at a fundraiser in San Antonio for endangered Rep. Ciro D. Rodriguez (D-Tex.) at the home of lawyer Frank Herrera.

Herrera, who has contributed more than $100,000 to Democrats since the early 1990s, said Sanchez was a surprise guest of another invitee. Sanchez knew Rodriguez casually, but the general had become close friends with House intelligence committee Chairman Sylvestre Reyes (D-Tex.), said Peter Brock, a Reyes spokesman. The Reyes connection had put Sanchez into the orbit of Texas's Latino Democratic power players.

...

"I'm beyond perplexed," said Sen. Lindsey O. Graham (S.C.), who criticized Sanchez at Senate Armed Services Committee hearings in 2004. "He's chosen to play politics here. He's opened himself up to what happened on his watch. He's made himself a political figure, and I hope he understands that those of us who were on the ground watching at that time are going to push back."

Graham said that he repeatedly asked Sanchez in private whether he needed more troops to pacify the fledgling insurgency, and that Sanchez always said no. "He never said any of these things when it could have made a difference," Graham said of Sanchez's criticism.

...

Sanchez stated publicly that he did not need additional troops, he just needed better intelligence. The irony is that Petraeus got better intelligence when he put more troops on the streets to defend the Iraqis, the very thing Sanchez rejected.

The meeting in San Antonio is filled with irony. Ciro Rodriquez is one of the beneficiaries of the largest donations from MoveOn.org. Silvestro Reyes is the intellectual light weight that Pelosi put in charge of the Intelligence Committee. Sanchez's affiliation with these two light weights should have been a tip that he is not that smart.

That he would let Pelosi use him for an attack on the current operations just proves his lack of intellect. The closer you look at the mess he made in Baghdad and Iraq, the more he looks like a diversity hire than someone who got their on merit. By joining the anti war left he has exposed his incompetence to a public debate which will further isolate him. That Pelosi thinks he is smart, tells you a lot about her own lack of intelligence.

Comments

  1. Sanchez's PAO, Col Jill Morgenthaler, is running as a Democrat in Illinois's 6th District.

    She had this to say on Sanchez on her website,

    Then, we had a change of command between Lieutenant General Sanchez and General Casey. LTG Sanchez has been a true leader. He stayed calm, focus and on mission as Abu Ghraib broke and stayed a story ad infinitum/ad nausea. He took responsibility for the crimes committed during his tenure. (Unlike some of the leaders of the infamous seven.) Hopefully, what his command tenure will be remembered for is: the capture of Saddam, the signing of the TAL, the transfer of sovereignty, the bringing of justice to Saddam and the 11, and the beginning of true freedom and self-governance for Iraq. God bless you, LTG Sanchez!

    I like to think of these folks as the MccLellan Democrats: Military leaders who give us a strategic defeat and then turn into peace candidates.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Iraq says civilian casualties in Mosul caused by ISIS booby trap, not US air strike

Liberal fascists strike against Trump supporters in Berkeley

OPEC reduces production again in price maintenance program