Deomcrats cannot be trusted with national security or secrets

Arnold Ahlert:

ONE of the most pressing questions for the 2006 elections is whether Democrats can be trusted with national security. If their collective reaction to the CIA's firing of Mary McCarthy is any indication, the answer is a resounding no.

McCarthy was fired for leaking classified information to a Washington Post reporter in direct violation of her oath of secrecy. That is, breaking the law - period. Yet in Democratic circles she is now called a "whistleblower" and a "heroine," even as she has seriously compromised CIA capabilities during wartime.

This affection for McCarthy may be influenced by the fact that the secrets she revealed are seen as damaging to the Bush administration. But if the Democrats' "litmus test" for heroism - as opposed to treason - is the revealing of top-secret information for political gain, they have proven once again their lust for power is more important than protecting the country.

...

I have said the same, but Ahlert does say it well.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Is the F-35 obsolete?