Climate change hot air

John McCaslin:

Visiting Britain this week to actually debate whatever similarities there are between terrorism and global warming is lawyer Christopher C. Horner, Washington counsel to the Competitive Enterprise Institute.
"How I looked forward to attending the long-scheduled event here in London at which British Prime Minister Tony Blair's chief science adviser, Sir David King, was to discuss his hysterical claim that global warming is a greater threat than terrorism, along with another non-expert on terrorism -- Greenpeace's chief 'climate' adviser," Mr. Horner told Inside the Beltway yesterday.
Here is the precise wording of the event, mailed to invitees on July 1 (obviously, before London's recent string of deadly terrorist attacks): "Is climate change really a greater threat than terrorism? Join the government's Chief Scientific Adviser Sir David King and Charlie Kronick, chief policy adviser for Greenpeace, to discuss this environmental issue and more."
As Mr. Horner pointed out: "Given they are both on record in the affirmative, this was hardly 'the Great Debate.' Oh, those intrusive realities, however.
"Recent London events in the form of an actual threat confronting society cast an uncomfortable context for this lack of proportion and perspective, what with the [London subway] tunnels still stained with blood and as many as 11 Britons buried in the rubble at Sharm el Sheik," he said, referring to the Egyptian Red Sea resort, the site of terror bombings last week.
So yesterday, the "climate-worse-than-terrorism" event was airbrushed into a simple inquiry: "Were the [Group of Eight] promises on climate change hot air?"

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more