Liberals having trouble with letting go of bloody shirt of Cleland's "heroic loss of limbs"

Ann Coulter:

"...they are clearly implying – without stating – that Cleland lost his limbs in combat.

"It is simply a fact that Max Cleland was not injured by enemy fire in Vietnam. He was not in combat, he was not – as Al Hunt claimed – on a reconnaissance mission, and he was not in the battle of Khe Sanh, as many others have implied. He picked up an American grenade on a routine noncombat mission and the grenade exploded.

"In Cleland's own words: 'I didn't see any heroism in all that. It wasn't an act of heroism. I didn't know the grenade was live. It was an act of fate.'

...

"...after Saxby Chambliss beat Cleland in the 2002 Georgia Senate race, liberals set to work developing a carefully crafted myth about Cleland's accident. Among many other examples, last November, Eric Boehlert wrote in Salon: '[D]uring the siege of Khe Sanh, Cleland lost both his legs and his right hand to a Viet Cong grenade.'

"Sadly for them, dozens and dozens of newspapers have already printed the truth. Liberals simply can't grasp the problem Lexis-Nexis poses to their incessant lying. They ought to stick to their specialty – hysterical overreaction. The truth is not their forte."

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Apple's huge investment in US including Texas facility

Is the F-35 obsolete?