Who wants to keep Hamas supporters in US?

 American Action News:

Former MSNBC host Mehdi Hasan could be seen melting down Wednesday on Piers Morgan’s show after being asked whether he believes pro-Hamas protesters with visas should still be allowed to stay in the United States.

Protests erupted earlier in the week after Syrian-born former Columbia graduate student Mahmoud Khalil was arrested by U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) officials Saturday following his involvement in a student encampment at the university last year. While discussing the arrest with fellow guest Republican Texas Rep. Dan Crenshaw on “Piers Morgan Uncensored,” Morgan jumped into the debate, honing in on the support of Hamas, which the United States designated as a foreign terrorist organization in 1997.

“Mehdi, let me ask you a question,” Morgan said. “Should somebody who’s in America on a green card be allowed to support a terror organization? Because according to all the paperwork you fill in when you apply for a green card, if you do support one you would not be given a green card. Hamas are a prescribed terror group in the United States. He has supported Hamas. Therefore, if the United States government wanted to revoke his green card, they are perfectly within their rights to do so, as Dan has articulated.”

“Not true. Piers, you don’t — No, no, Dan has not articulated that at all,” Hasan said. “No law has been cited that says you can revoke his green card because of his speech. Piers, you don’t know what you’re talking about. You can’t revoke a green card because you don’t like someone’s speech.”

According to the Associated Press, Khalil’s green card was revoked due to alleged “activities aligned with Hamas, a designated terrorist organization,” leading to his arrest by DHS officials. Following the Syrian-born man’s arrest, Secretary of State Marco Rubio posted on X on Sunday, writing that the Trump administration “will be revoking the visas and/or green cards of Hamas supporters in America so they can be deported.”
...

Hamas is an Islamist terrorist organization and some of its followers have called for the genocide of the Jews. I suspect that is enough to get them banned.
See also:
Mahmoud Khalil is an extreme example, but many immigrants seem to revile the U.S
The arrest and threatened deportation of the pro-Hamas Columbia agitator Mahmoud Khalil has exposed an often-overlooked nuance of the immigration debate: Not all the hungry, poor, huddled masses who come to this country yearn to breathe free. Some come to mess with us.
...

And:

 Vivid.🇮🇱

This is the “Free Palestine” movement.

- Hamas flags  

- Death to America  

- Violent and aggressive  

- Genocidal slogans to Jews  

- Anti-American scum  

Deport them all.

And:

 Trump Issues Stern Ultimatum to Hamas: Release Hostages or Face Dire Consequences

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more