Looking at Dems reaction to another Trump term or DeSantis

 Rich Lowry:

...

If Trump wins the presidency again, it will be mayhem. The reaction of the other side will make what happened after the 2016 election seem mild in comparison. You don’t ever want to give the opposition a veto, but how the opposition reacts affects how a president can govern. Democrats would certainly find a reason to deny the legitimacy of a President DeSantis, but his cabinet secretaries probably wouldn’t have to have bomb-sniffing dogs checking their cars every morning. That would matter, and it would be better than the alternative of the Left trying to convince itself, in a paroxysm of anti-Trump rage, that it needs to try to forge some sort of American color revolution.

Then there’s the question of age. Trump seems youthful and vital compared with President Biden. He’s still 76 years old, though. In the unlikely event that Biden runs again, a Trump–Biden race will be aged-on-aged violence that will be a great victory, one way or the other, for the American gerontocracy. A DeSantis–Biden race, on the other hand, would set up a simple future-vs.-past contest like Clinton vs. Dole in 1996 or Obama vs. McCain in 2008.
...

It is the nature of the current Democrats to get hysterical about whomever the GOP nominee will be.  They will also attempt to criminalize a Republican President as they have tried to do in the past with Trump without ever saying what crime they think he committed other than winning an election.  I do think Trump was far superior to Biden as a president in both foreign policy and in terms of the economy.  I also think DeSantis would do a better job than Biden or other leading Democrats.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more