Texas and Florida continue to outperform mask maniac states

 Jazz Shaw:

Since everyone loves a good mystery, let’s see if we can’t puzzle this one out. A report from Fox News shows that new COVID cases in both Florida and Texas continue to decline, though Florida’s numbers are still a bit above the national average. That’s the good news. The not-so-good news is that Pennsylvania, New York and Michigan are currently leading the pack in terms of new cases. Some of that can be attributed to which states are still conducting more aggressive testing regimens, but not all of it. So where is the mystery in all of this? As the report points out, Texas has been fully reopened without a mask mandate for more than six weeks and Florida has been in the same situation for considerably longer. New York, Michigan and Pennsylvania are still under various levels of lockdown protocols with mask mandates in place. So if those policies are as effective as everyone keeps telling us, why aren’t we seeing more of a disparity in the numbers in the opposite direction?

Republican-led states including Texas and Florida are reporting fewer coronavirus cases than Michigan, Pennsylvania and New York — all of which are led by prominent Democrats who refuse to roll back COVID-19 regulations and statewide mask mandates, according to CDC data.

Texas Gov. Greg Abbott was widely criticized by the left after he completely reversed the state’s mandate on March 10 and fully reopened his state. Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis was also accused of endangering Florida residents when he allowed businesses to fully reopen in September without a mask mandate in place.

While both states managed to keep case positivity rates down and begin the long road to economic recovery, Pennsylvania, New York and Michigan — who are still bound to ongoing restrictions — have led the daily increase in COVID-19 cases.

The reality of these mandates is beginning to sink in for a lot of people and we’re not just talking about the usual suspects here. Even Joe Scarborough on MSNBC was lecturing the audience this morning about the idiocy of continuing with outdoor mask mandates in particular.

The explanation suggested in the linked report doesn’t really answer all of the questions we should be asking, at least as far as I’m concerned. Simply saying “Republican Governor Good, Democratic Governor Bad” is a rather heavy-handed and unspecific approach. (Even if it works out to be the reality of the situation in the end.) There’s got to be more to the story.

If mask mandates were truly effective, we should be seeing the lowest number of new weekly cases in the states that have them. We’re not seeing that. But if face mask mandates – particularly for outdoor activity – made absolutely no difference, we should be seeing roughly the same number of new cases across the board when taking other factors like population density into consideration. That’s not the situation being observed either. Texas is actually making significantly more progress than Michigan, which is heading back in the wrong direction. And Michigan is one of the most tightly controlled states in the country in these terms.

...

We should be incentivizing the vaccine over the masks.  If you tell people you can leave your mask at home if you get vaccinated, I think most people would take that deal.  What we are seeing with the different results in different states is that the efficacy of wearing a mask looks grossly overrated.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more