Hunter Biden under federal investigation for money laundering

 Townhall:

How long can the media ignore this story? They’re trying to suffocate it with a pillow a la One Flew Over the Cuckoo’s Nest. It’s a story. Sorry, you may not like it. I know you hate the timing, liberal media, but Joe Biden, his son Hunter, and his brother Jim might all be dirty. The Biden camp has yet to refute the scores of emails from Hunter Biden that weave a sordid and wide-reaching web of corruption. You already know about Hunter’s Burisma gig in Ukraine, where he was getting $50k/month to reportedly sell access to top Obama officials. This arrangement was made back in 2014-15, around the time daddy Biden, the VP, was helming our policy efforts there. Joe fired the prosecutor looking into Burisma for corruption by threatening to ax aid to the country. Emails show Burisma executives expected legal protection with Hunter’s position. They got it. Joe Biden went rogue to protect his son. 

With the China deal, which looks like another corrupt venture, that arrangement has been further fleshed out by whistleblower Tony Bobulinski, who gave the FBI all records and devices related to these alleged shady deals with CEFC China Energy, which has ties to the government. This deal was first hashed out when Joe was VP, the deal sought to give Joe, identified as “big guy” in these emails, a 10 percent equity stake, and Bobulinski straight-up has said that a) the Bidens are compromised, b) Joe knew full well what his son was doing. He was in on it. Hell, Hunter called his dad the “chairman.” The deal collapsed in 2017, but not after the Chinese firm doled out a $5 million personal loan to the Bidens. And now, we have confirmation from Department of Justice officials that Hunter Biden has been under federal investigation for money laundering since 2019.

...

There is more.

At what point does the mainstream media begin to look like coconspirators in the case?  It is pretty clear the Feds are not buying the Democrats "Russian disinformation" scam.  I think the chances that Joe Biden will come clean about his part in the alleged crime are remote.  He appears to have put himself out on a limb with his denials.  Who will be the first journalists to ask Biden if he wins the election will he pardon his family members if they are indicted?

 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more