The anti rule of law bigotry of the left

Washington Post:
It was never about the wall, the border or the economy. It’s always been bigotry.
The left resorts to insults to justify its attacks on the rule of law.  They are pushing a policy that would allow them to pick and choose which laws are to be obeyed as long as they see political advantage in the breaking of the law. 

In the case of immigration, they are using illegal immigrants to steal house seats by counting them in the census giving Democrats seats they are not entitled to.  Some Democrats are even talking about allowing illegals to cancel the votes to real citizens. 

It really does not matter what the ethnicity of the illegal is.  If they were all English men and women it would still be wrong to allow them to evade the law.  If it takes a wall to get people to enter the country legally then so be it.  It is the left that supports allowing people they think may be future Democrats to jump the queue.  It is not about Hispanics.  In fact, Hispanics who are in this country legally are just as likely as non-Hispanics to oppose illegal entry.

Hispanics who work for the Border Patrol and for ICE are not bigots.  They are patriots.  I grew up on the border with these people and think they are good citizens.  I fought in Vietnam with them.  It is absurd to claim those good citizens who support the rule of law are bigots.  It is an example of how out of touch the left in this country is.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more