The case for reparations is ridiculous

Guardian:
The Case for Reparations Is Solid 
This is historical clap trap.  Should the Egyptians be paying reparations to the Jews whose slave labor they used to build the pyramids and still make money off of?   Should the Turks and Arabs be paying reparations to Europeans for the galley slaves they used on their ships?  How about paying it to the Slavs whose use as slaves gave rise to the word slave.

I make no excuses for slavery, but it should be noted that Africans were involved in the slave trade too, but there is no movement to make their ancestors pay reparations.  The forced migration of blacks to the new world was wrong, but their progeny are clearly better off than they would have been if they had remained in Africa.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more