Turning the tables on Ecuador

Fuel Fix:
Faced with a $19 billion fine for polluting Ecuador’s rainforest, Chevron Corp. has done a remarkable job of turning the tables on its foes.

The lawyers who sued Chevron in Ecuador, winning that eye-popping judgment, have come under non-stop attack from the oil company. Chevron has hauled them into court in New York, accusing them of fraud and extortion. The company has gone after Ecuador’s judicial system as well, claiming judges there conspired with the other side.

That aggressive strategy has worked wonders, putting Chevron’s opponents on the defensive and convincing many people that the Ecuador suit is a sham.

And you can trace much of that strategy back to a 2008 memo by San Francisco’s master of crisis communications, Sam Singer.

Singer has built up an impressive practice of counseling companies, public agencies and government officials facing controversy. In October 2008, he sent Chevron spokesman Kent Robertson a four-page memo outlining steps the company could take to change public perceptions of the Ecuador lawsuit.

Singer recommended going on the offensive. The company should portray Ecuador’s court system as corrupt, with collusion between judges and the plaintiffs in the lawsuit. Pointing out the leftward tilt of Ecuadoran President Rafael Correa wouldn’t hurt.

And Singer recommended “counter attacks” on the plaintiffs and their legal team, particularly lead lawyer Steven Donziger.

Bear in mind that the memo was written more than two years before the Ecuadoran judge presiding over the lawsuit ruled against Chevron, in February 2011.

Fast-forward to 2013. Much of what Singer suggested has come to pass.

Chevron has gone after Donziger with a vengeance, making him the focus of the extortion suit and even obtaining his personal diary.

The company regularly criticizes Ecuador’s judiciary and, early this year, produced a statement from a former judge who said the plaintiffs agreed to pay a $500,000 bribe to win the suit. (The plaintiffs, in return, accused Chevron of offering judges bribes in return for false statements about the case. The company agreed to pay that particular judge $38,000 for his time and effort, along with $10,000 per month in living expenses.)

Back in 2008, the company had not yet obtained — via court order — outtakes from the documentary movie “Crude” that showed Donziger talking about trying to pressure judges and calling evidence in the trial “smoke and mirrors and bulls***.” Chevron also hadn’t yet obtained his diary or many of his e-mails concerning the lawsuit. But the company, Singer said, was convinced that it was being railroaded.
It was a good strategy that has put the plaintiff's and the Ecuadorian judiciary on the defensive.  I have consistently questioned the  plaintiff's case.  Chevron has a very good chance of turning the tables on the Plaintiffs and getting a judgment of their own.


Popular posts from this blog

US, Britain and Israel help Iranian nuclear scientist escape

Iran loses another of its allies in Iraq

The Democrat screw up on the 80% rule for insurers