What bias looks like at the Washington Post

John Nolte:
...Compare today's story about Mitt Romney to a 2008 story the Washington Post published about then-candidate Obama's formative years. 
Just for starters, look at the difference in the headlines. Mitt Romney's immediately tagged as the prep schooler with troubling incidents in his past. By contrast, Obama is headlined as a thoughtful Seeker. The Romney article opens immediately with the tale of Romney's homophobic bullying. 
This is in stark contrast to the opening of the '08 Obama piece which paints a picture of Obama's hard-scrabble life growing up in Hawaii. 
Hilariously, you have to read -- no joke -- over 8,800 word before the words "drug use," "marijuana," or "cocaine" are mentioned in reference to Obama. 
This is how the Washington Post tries to get away with claiming it covered Obama's sordid past but also how it gets away with covering Obama's sordid past without defining Their Candidate in a way that might hurt his chances of winning an election....
The bullying story seems to be falling apart.  Romney has no recollection of the events and neither does the family of the purported victim.  But the Post got the story out there regardless of the facts in a blatant attempt to help the Obama campaign.

You can see more on the unraveling of this story here.  It turns out that one of the sources for the story never saw the events that allegedly took place.

An Automobile Magazine piece contradicts several aspects of the Post story quoting the same sources.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Apple's huge investment in US including Texas facility