How to get a government job in Obama administration

David Hirsayni:

Political payoffs are so commonplace in Washington that I was initially unable to muster an appropriate level of outrage at hearing that Rep. Joe Sestak had accused the Obama administration of offering him a job in exchange for his withdrawal from the Pennsylvania Democratic Senate primary.

Until, that is, I heard President Barack Obama's senior adviser, David Axelrod, explain to CNN's John King that though there was "no evidence" (hey, if the administration's senior adviser claims there is no evidence, we should move along), if such an offer were made it would constitute "a serious breach of the law."

If the Democratic Party's choice for the Senate in Pennsylvania is a fabulist — as Axelrod is effectively saying — why does Sestak's story sound so familiar to one in the Democratic Senate primary in Colorado?

In September 2009, an article headlined "D.C. job alleged as attempt to deter Romanoff" by the Denver Post's Michael Riley reported that Andrew Romanoff, former speaker of the Colorado House who was then still contemplating a run again against the governor-installed, administration-sanctioned foot soldier Michael Bennet, received an "unexpected communication" from a renowned kingmaker in Washington.

"Jim Messina, President Barack Obama's deputy chief of staff and a storied fixer in the White House political shop," wrote Riley at the time, "suggested a place for Romanoff might be found in the administration and offered specific suggestions, according to several sources who described the communication to The Denver Post."

Apparently if you're running against the establishment's preference, a communication from Messina should not be entirely unexpected.

...

Does it matter? The entire statute can be found online by searching for "US Code — Section 600: Promise of employment or other benefit for political activity." After reading the law, it is clear that any offer of a job "directly or indirectly . . . to any person as consideration, favor, or reward for any political activity . . . in connection with any general or special election to any political office, or in connection with any primary election" is an illegal act. (The liberal use of italics is mine.)

Conceivably, the U.S. Agency for International Development was frantically hunting for someone with Romanoff's unique work and life experiences exactly at the time everyone in Colorado knew he was contemplating a challenge against the largely unknown Bennet. Or, perhaps, Romanoff, once a moderate liberal and now running populist left, was exactly the kind of recognized contender who could cause trouble for an untested candidate.

...

My money would be on the latter. I wonder if Messina had any communications with Sestek. I think we will probably find out about 5 p.m. today on the Friday before Memorial day. Making reporters work on a holiday weekend seems to be the politics of hoping for second string coverage.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more