Democrats immigration dilemma

Democracy Corps is made up of Democratic operatives like James Carville and Stan Greenberg. They recently did a comprehensive study of the immigration issue and noted some key vulnerabilities.

They note that benefits beyond emergency care and education are opposed by most Democrats, not to mention Republicans. Counter arguments on safety were clearly rejected. Employer enforcement is also strongly supported. In other words on this issue the Democrats are much closer to Republican positions than their own candidates.

What the study does not address is a key vulnerability of the Democrat candidates on the issue of benefits. Around one third of the uninsured in this country are illegal immigrants, yet every Democrat candidate has a proposal to give them health care coverage. They appear to be headed for a collision with their own supporters on this issue and not one has addressed it. Hopefully, Republicans will not make that mistake.

Health care which Democrats think is their issue will turn out to be a real problem for them before this campaign is finished.

BTW, the study appears to suggest that a path to citizenship plan might get majority support. I think Republicans can counter this with an obvious solution. There is already a path to citizenship called an application, and those who came here illegally should not jump in line ahead of those who play by the rules.

This study was not good news for Democrats on an issue that is important to voters of both parties. It will be interesting to see how Democrat "core beliefs" confirm to the survey.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more