Democrats, NY Times support for voter fraud

Don Surber:

They registered dead people on Indian reservations to try to keep Tom Daschle in the Senate.

They still allow the dead to vote in Southern West Virginia, allowing Democrats to maintain control of the Legislature for 70+ years.

They still have the Daley machine in Cook County keeping Illinois safely in Democratic hands.

Small wonder the New York Times opposes efforts to clean up political fraud -- the cancellation of my votes by phonies, frauds and felons.

In a despicable editorial today, "Keep Away the Vote," the Pinch people try to make the case against requiring the same Photo ID needed to buy beer or cigarettes:
The bill was sold as a means of deterring vote fraud, but that is a phony argument. There is no evidence that a significant number of people are showing up at the polls pretending to be other people, or that a significant number of noncitizens are voting.
I can prove the fraud in West Virginia.

I can show the buying and selling of votes in the last 12 elections in Lincoln and Logan counties.

Can the Times prove that illegal aliens do not vote? Can the Times prove that convicted murderers do not vote? Can the Times prove that votes are not cast in the name of the dead?

...
There is more. He is right about the evidence of fraud and it appears to favor Democrats in most cases. The suggestion that elderly or the poor can't come up with ID's is ridulous. ID are required for many normal functions of life in this country and voting should be considered as such. What is going on here is the Democrats determination to win by cheating with the help of its support network in the liberal media.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more