Deal avoids issue of Geneva Conventions

President Bush got a deal that permits the CIA to do aggressive interrigation of terrorist to learn their plots without messing with the grossly overrated Geneva Conventions. They were too important to a handful of Republicans who sided witht he terrorist rights Democrats. To get around the problem the war crimes act would be amended to make it clear that European interpretations of violations would not be permitted.

While the NY Times overstates the importance of the President's consession, the bottom line is he got what he wanted--the ability to continue the interrogations without subjecting the CIA employeees to legal violations. The Times did this because it overrates the "value" of the Geneva Conventions which have been wholly ineffective at protecting US forces and have become a unilateral contract that has the effect of awarding the terrorist for violating its terms.

Comments

  1. Reliapundit9:59 PM

    merv: would you like to join my group blog? you'd only have to post 1-2 posts/day; they could link back to your blog.

    i think you're one of the best all round news aggregators/commentators in the blogosphere, and deserve a bigger audience.

    if you could keep your posts down to 250/post and always indent/italicize the quouted section, and always post links to the newsitems, and ALWAYS end with a pithy comment, then you'd be perfect.

    think about it. let mer know. of course you'd keep bloggin at PP.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more