The 'progressive' position on tyranny and oppression

Melanie Phillips:

The news that President Bush has nominated Paul Wolfowitz to run the World Bank has sent the appeasement crowd into a frenzy. Hardly had they got over the shock that John Bolton, the abrasive UN critic, had been appointed ambassador to that nest of vipers than the intellectual architect of the Iraq war himself was now being put up to run international development. The idea that, as a result, the tyrants and dictators who have used the UN to foment global terror might be held to account for the first time, and that international aid might no longer be used to line the pockets of said tyrants and dictators thus financing said global terror, is regarded of course by the appeasement crowd as the end of the world as they know it. Cause for a double dose of garlic to wave in the direction of these iconic princelings of darkness. The Guardian's leader contains a particularly priceless observation about Wolfowitz:

'Some worry that his strong emphasis on human rights may complicate relations with China.'

Thus the 'progressive' position on tyranny and oppression.

...

Melanie thinks Condi may have moved Bolton and Wolfowitz out os position to influence policy. I am not sure. If I were President, I would still give someone as smart as Wolfowitz a call to get his thoughts on issues.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more