Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

The impenetrable darkness of the anti-Bush mind

Tony Blankley:

It's a little odd that the most vehement support for President Bush's proposition that democracy is the best cure for terrorism came from the curling lips of Mr. Abu Musab Zarqawi.
The infidel-beheading terrorist butcher of Baghdad announced, in a post-Inaugural web-site broadcast (not to be confused with American network television's post-speech commentary and analysis) that "We have declared a fierce war on this evil principle of democracy and those who follow this wrong ideology. Anyone who tries to help set up this system is part of it. [Iraqi candidates] are demi-idols, and [voters] are infidels."
With such a hard-hitting critique of the president's speech, he might well be in line for a political analyst slot at CBS.
Obviously Mr. Zarqawi,recently anointed by Osama bin Laden himself, feels toward democracy much the way the wicked witch of the east felt toward water. It seems pretty clear from Zarqawi's analysis of the Iraqi political scene that he is every bit as opposed to President Bush's policy as is Sen. Barbara Boxer and the rest of Mr. Bush's political opponents.
His effort at defeating Mr. Bush's democracy project for Iraq brings a whole new meaning to the phrase negative campaigning. Instead of rude or false charges hurled at a candidate, Zarqawi hurls suicide bombs at both candidates and voters.
His actions, bloody though they are, constitute eloquent testimony to his and Mr. Bush's shared understanding of Iraq's future. Zarqawi is fighting democracy for his dear life because he understands, as does Mr. Bush, that an established democracy in Iraq will be the death of terrorism in Iraq — and possibly beyond.
If Mrs. Boxer and her fellow deprecators of Iraqi democracy won't accept Mr. Bush's insights on the efficacy of democracy, perhaps she might reconsider in light of Zarqawi's comments. After all, when the leading terrorist and Mr. Bush agree on something, the light of that shared vision might even penetrate the until-now impenetrable darkness of the anti-Bush mind.
Something had better jog the liberal mind from its obsessive Bush-hatred. The liberals, on both sides of the Atlantic, are in imminent danger of repeating the great shame of many of their ideological grandparents in the middle of the last century, who became unthinking apologists for Stalin's terror and tyranny.
This coming Sunday, the Iraqi people are holding an election — the first real election in the 5,000-year history of this ancient people. But the cynicism and indifference of liberals to this extraordinary event should shock the conscience of decent people,becauseIraqisare marching through shot and shell to gain this first chance at self-government.

I think the liberals should apologise and admit they are wrong.