Explosive story blows up in NY Times face

With NBC's report that the explosives were missing when the US got to the site in Iraq the Times story is revealed as just another CBS type hit piece on the Bush administration based on sloppy or biased journalism.

But the missing explosives raises another more important question that the Times and the rest of the media is ignoring. If Saddam could make over 300 tons of explosive disappear before the war, couldn't he make WMD disappear too?

If you inhabit the angry left swamps and think "Bush lied" about WMD, do you think the IAEA lied about the explosives? Or is it more rational to think the Iraqis disbursed it into hiding places around the country?

Now that we know that the explosives did not disappear because the US troops were ignoring the danger, isn't it time for the NY Times to print a front page correction? Or will they stonewall until after the election like CBS?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more