The Dems' support for illegal voters

 DC Daily Journal:

...

Rep. Chip Roy (R-Texas), chair of the Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government, stated in a letter obtained by Fox Digital, “The Subcommittee on the Constitution and Limited Government is conducting oversight of the apparent coordination between the Civil Rights Division and left-wing advocacy groups to impede the ability of states to ensure the accuracy of their voter rolls.”

Recently, the DOJ sued Alabama and Virginia, claiming these states violated a rule known as the Quiet Period Provision, which mandates that voter roll maintenance programs must conclude no later than 90 days before a federal election. In his letter, Rep. Roy pressed the DOJ for an explanation on the timing of these lawsuits.

As the DOJ filed its suit against Virginia, it argued, “This systematic voter removal program, which the State is conducting within 90 days of the upcoming federal election, violates the Quiet Period Provision.”

Virginia, however, has defended its approach, calling it “individualized” and consistent with both state and federal law. While a lower court initially ordered 1,600 individuals to be restored to the rolls, the Supreme Court has since blocked that order.

A similar lawsuit filed by the DOJ targeted Alabama, with the DOJ alleging that voter roll updates there occurred just 84 days before Election Day.
...

Roy remarked, “The cases involve the same or similar plaintiffs and lawyers and follow a similar pattern with respect to the timing of each complaint. These circumstances raise questions as to whether the DOJ’s Civil Rights Division is working with these groups to file cases to keep noncitizens on voter rolls just before the 2024 election and prevent states from ensuring that only eligible citizens vote in federal elections.”

Roy noted that the DOJ has agreed to consolidate its lawsuits with those filed by Left-wing groups, many of which oppose the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act, legislation requiring proof of citizenship for federal voting.
...

I get the impression that Democrats think they benefit from the votes of illegals. I see no rational explanation for allowing illegal votes.  The 90-day Quite Period should not be used to allow illegal voting.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare