US agrees to ceasefire language for Gaza

 USA Today:

After days of negotiations, the U.S. signaled late Thursday it was ready to support a revised United Nations Security Council resolution urging delivery of crucial humanitarian aid into the battered Gaza Strip where roughly one in four people are starving.

An earlier draft brought forward by the United Arab Emirates called for a "cessation of hostilities," later dialed back to a "suspension of hostilities." A revised version would call for “creating the conditions for a sustainable cessation of hostilities.”

A vote on the revised resolution was not expected until Friday.

Seeking to avoid another U.S. veto, the 15-member council delayed voting multiple times since Monday to negotiate the language. U.S. Ambassador Linda Thomas-Greenfield told reporters after the consultations that the United States backs the new text, and if it is put to a vote the U.S. will support it.

Earlier this month, the U.S. vetoed a Security Council resolution supported by almost all council members and many other nations that called for an immediate humanitarian cease-fire in Gaza. The General Assembly overwhelmingly approved a similar resolution on Dec. 12 in a 153-10 vote with 23 abstentions.
...

I suspect the conditions for a sustainable cessation of hostilities will probably mean the virtual destruction of Hamas leadership and fighters.  Hamas started this war with the mass murder of Israeli civilians.  It should not be surprising that Israel would want to stop that from ever happening again.  If people in Gaza are starving it is because Hamas provoked the hostilities to begin with.  Polling also showed that a majority of the Palestinians in Gaza supported the attacks on Israel.  The Palestinians should not be surprised that there are consequences for such attacks.

See also:

Gazans Are Starting to Blame Hamas for Wartime Suffering

And:

 Little food, a beating and lice: What freed Israeli hostages are saying about being held by Hamas

And:

 Israel's military campaign in Gaza seen as among the most destructive in recent history, experts say

Hamas and its supporters in Gaza are paying a price for their war crimes against Israelis. 

And:

Palestinians support Hamas decision to go to war with Israel, survey suggests, with no political solution on horizon

And:

 Watch: Israel Detonates Major Hamas Tunnel, Creating Massive Fireball in Gaza Neighborhood

The network of tunnels linked the homes of several top Hamas leaders in Gaza City, according to the Israel Defense Forces

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more