Democrat judge accused of election interference

 Mark Levine:

Chutkan rules against Trump over and over again, despite the seriousness of his motions -- she has violated his 1st (gag rule), 5th (due process), and 6th (effective representation of counsel) amendment rights; she has said outrageous things about Trump when sentencing other defendants yet refused to recuse herself; she put an outrageously short timeline on defense counsels' trial prep; and now she has rule he cannot subpoena the Jan. 6 committee records, yet a few days ago ruled that she would not strike references to the violence on Jan. 6 from papers filed by the government, which is obviously prejudicial to Trump. 
This follows the denial to Trump of his attorney-client privilege right by another judge on her last day as chief judge (thereby forcing his lawyer to testify against him and provide notes to the grand jury; this was done in a secret proceeding.). AND, of course, not only is the current judge a radical Obama appointee, the grand jury was made up of individuals who came out of DC's overwhelmingly Democrat population and the trial jury will be chosen from the same jury pool. Indeed, Chutkan even called the New York judge in the NDA case (another outrageous abuse of power) to allow her to set the Jan. 6 case first. 
Finally, the "special counsel" chosen in this case is a known rogue head-hunter admonished previously by the U.S. Supreme Court in an 8 - 0 decision against him. There is no question at all that this judge, working with the radical DOJ senior Biden team, is interfering with the upcoming election and is intent on ensuring that Trump is found guilty of at least one of the preposterous charges brought against him, thereby giving the Democrats and the media the tagline "convicted felon" when referencing Trump. There was no need for this case to be brought or scheduled during the election as there were no statute of limitations issues or urgency. 
This is one of the most obvious and appalling railroading of an individual in our republic's history, and it's being done to a former president of the United States who is running for another presidential term. Our prosecutorial and judicial system is now corrupt to the core. And tens of millions of Americans will not accept the 2024 presidential election results should Trump lose BECAUSE of the unconscionable abuse of power in pursuit of Trump. 
And no number of reporters and commentators labeling Trump worse than Hitler (another disgusting low point in our country), or accusing him of opposing democracy, or claiming he is going to "imprison" and "execute people" will change what they are doing. Their actions and propaganda are incredibly irresponsible and dangerous....

I don't think Trump will get a fair trial in her court and the DC appellate courts are just as biased against him. Because it is DC there is little chance of a change of venue to get a fair trial.  What is happening is that Democrats don't think they can beat Trump who is leading Biden in the polls so they are seeking to criminalize him to avoid running against him.

See also:

Dems Are Getting Mugged By Reality, Often Literally

And:

 ‘Fishing Expedition’: Federal Judge Tanya Chutkan Shoots Down Trump Request To Subpoena January 6 Committee Records

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more