Beto's education spending problem

 Washington Examiner:

School choice is becoming a bigger issue in Texas's gubernatorial race. After Texas Gov. Greg Abbott announced he intends to support educational freedom during the state’s 2023 legislative session, Democratic gubernatorial candidate Beto O’Rourke claimed, “Abbott is for defunding our public schools.”

O’Rourke has repeated this claim in radio and newspaper ads targeting rural Texas areas. But Texas's K-12 education spending data do not support O’Rourke’s allegation. Between 2002 and 2020, inflation-adjusted education spending in Texas increased by 16%, going from $11,473 per student to $13,346 per student.

THE DEMOCRATS' UNDEMOCRATIC RHETORIC ABOUT 'SAVING DEMOCRACY'

Much of this funding increase went to staffing costs, with spending on employee benefits — a Census Bureau data category that includes teacher pensions and healthcare expenses — rising by 24% per student . Capital expenditures, such as building construction and equipment, have shot up by nearly 18% per student since 2002.

While it’s true that Texas trails the national spending average by $2,716 per student , that is partly because Texas is a relatively low-cost-of-living state. Legal rulings have also prompted policies restricting what single school districts can raise locally for their own operating costs, such as salaries and classroom supplies.

These policies mean wealthy school districts can’t drive up the statewide spending average as easily as they do in other states, resulting in a more equitable funding system that complies with the state’s constitution. For example, Austin, where property values are among the highest in the state, was required to send over $762 million of its local education-focused property tax money to other school districts across the state last year.

O’Rourke’s defunding claims also ignore important school finance legislation Abbott signed into law in 2019 with overwhelming bipartisan support. House Bill 3 made critical changes to the state’s funding formula and added $6.5 billion in new education spending, including bumps to the minimum teacher salary schedule and other assurances that increase teacher compensation.
...

There is more.

I do not see any evidence to support O'rourke's position on education spending.  I am pretty sure that education taxes are still being collected. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more