Progressivism exposed in hearing

 Roger L.Simon:

When Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.) asked Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson, during Jackson’s U.S. Supreme Court confirmation hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee, to define the word “woman,” she got the response “I can’t.”

When Blackburn responded with an incredulous “You can’t?” Jackson replied: “Not in this context. I’m not a biologist.”

It takes a biologist to define a woman? Does Jackson think we’re morons?

In a way, yes. Or she doesn’t care.

She’s a progressive, and progressives have been redefining language—English and many others—to fit their purposes dating back to the Spanish Civil War and undoubtedly earlier. (See Davis Hunt III at The Pamphleteer.)

Jackson bloody well knows what a woman is. The nominee has known this all her life, as we all have. But these days, in her part of the political world, she’s not supposed to.

So, she lied.
...

Liberals have been trying to normalize the trans movement so they can't be honest about obvious gender differences.  It is why Twitter is showing the same idiocy by blocking those who do not buy into it and refuse to accept the trans movement as normal.  That does not mean people are being cruel to someone with gender dysphoria.  It does mean that they are not willing to believe a lie.  Progressives apparently are.

See, also:

The Most Disqualifying Statement Ketanji Brown Jackson Has Made Yet

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains