The left's bogus 'misinformation' campaign

 Dan Bongino:

One of the left's favorite weapons has been the misinformation, or disinformation, label. They love it. They slap it onto anything that doesn't tow their political line. They use it to paint real experts and genuine people as conspiracy theorists just to ban voices they don't like.

Take White House press secretary Jen Psaki, for example. She's been pushing this disinformation garbage from the very beginning. Remember this tweet just before the election about Hunter Biden? "Hunter Biden story is Russian disinfo, dozens of former intel officials say."

But wait, take a look at this here: Just this week, we learned the New York Times is suing the State Department for refusing to release those very same emails from Hunter Biden. I thought they were "disinformation." What happened? It turns out that Jen Psaki's tweet about disinformation … yeah, that was actually the disinformation itself.

Do you understand what's happening here, folks? Psaki isn't talking about real disinformation. She's using that label to advance her preferred political argument. You see, that's what they do. We're seeing things that were once categorized as misinformation or disinformation now becoming accepted narratives without the facts ever changing. … The left is desperate to silence you, dissenting voices and facts.

They have also been using Big Tech to silence critics of the administration and the left by using that label to censor critics.  One of the more notorious examples is falsely accusing the label to cover up Biden family corruption exposed by the NY Post during the campaign.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t...
Read more

Is the F-35 obsolete?

Headline USA: Pentagon Fires Back after Musk Calls Its Most Expensive Project ‘Obsolete’ 'Yeah, as I'm sure you can appreciate, Mr. Musk is, currently, a private citizen, I'm not going to make any comments about what a private citizen may have to say about the F-35....'   ... ... Drones appear to be replacing jets for many operations.  The Russia-Ukraine war is an example of that.  Drones are often hard to detect and can be used for intelligence operations as well as for attacking enemy targets.  It would not surprise me to see drones engaging other drones in combat.  They also cost much less than manned fighters.  
Read more