Biden soft on crime by illegals

 Washington Examiner:

What exactly does an illegal immigrant have to do to get deported by President Joe Biden?

Because apparently, vandalizing Union Station in Washington, D.C., with swastikas isn’t enough.

Last month, swastikas were drawn near entrances to Union Station, just blocks away from the U.S. Capitol. The usual suspects instantly blamed former President Donald Trump for creating an environment in which white supremacists feel free to intimidate minorities. As usual, that wasn't it.

Surveillance cameras helped nab the real culprit — Geraldo Pando, a 34-year-old illegal immigrant from Mexico with a 35-page criminal history. He had been arrested just weeks earlier by the Capitol Police for vandalizing the agency's headquarters.

Did U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement come get Pando when they learned that an illegal immigrant with felony convictions had been arrested blocks from the Capitol? Nope. The police were forced to release him yet again since no one from ICE even asked that he be detained. Pando is exactly the kind of illegal immigrant that Biden’s lax immigration policies are designed to protect.

On his first day in office, Biden issued an executive order halting all interior deportations for 100 days. Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas followed up with new enforcement guidelines drastically restricting ICE agents’ ability to arrest, detain, and deport even criminal illegal immigrants.

Under the new rules, agents can only arrest illegal immigrants who entered illegally after Nov. 1, 2021, are national security threats, or have committed serious felonies.

...

To say that the Biden administration's handling of illegals is idiotic is an understatement.  They are deliberately ignoring US law and it should be another count in a Biden impeachment trial.  In the case of crime beyond being here illegally, the Biden administration is putting illegals ahead of citizens who are the victims of these crimes.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains

James Robbins: ... Bin Laden suggests that President Bush should allow Zarqawi’s body to be returned to his family in Jordan, but this is a matter that is up to the Jordanian government, which so far has not shown much interest in facilitating a homecoming. Bin Laden mocks King Abdullah II, calling him a Coalition minion, and asking “w hat scares you about Abu Musab after he’s dead? You know that his funeral, if allowed to happen, would be a huge funeral showing the extent of sympathy with the mujahedin.” A large crowd would definitely turn out, though most people would be on hand to demonstrate their anger and disgust. Last November’s hotel bombings in Amman , masterminded by Zarqawi, are still fresh in people’s memory, and mentioning them to Jordanians has the same visceral impact as memory of the 9/11 attacks does here. Jordan has adopted a zero-tolerance policy towards those who choose to mourn the country’s least favorite son, and four opposition members of parliament who paid con
Read more