Iran remains intransigent about talks with US

Washington Post:
Trump’s competing instincts on Iran: Big threats vs. eagerness to make a deal

The president is caught between a political imperative to confront Iran — pleasing hawkish Republicans and allies — and his instincts against foreign intervention and toward cutting a deal.

Tehran rules out talks with U.S. as Trump steps back from directly blaming Iran

Iran’s supreme leader said that if the United States returned to the nuclear deal Tehran struck with world powers, then it could take part in negotiations along with the agreement’s other signatories.
Iran is making it easier for the US and its allies to counter-attack against their recent aggression in Saudi Arabia.  The doves have fewer excuses as long as Iran refuses to talk.  Iran would be vulnerable to cruise missile attacks against its naval infrastructure and against its own oil and gas facilities.

Some have suggested the US should strike Iran's proxies in the region:
After Attacks on Saudi Oil, Time for Trump to Strike Iran’s Proxies

Opinion: The administration needs to escalate maximum pressure beyond sanctions
I think Iran should be the target.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Bin Laden's concern about Zarqawi's remains