Obama out of touch on government labor dispute

DC rally in support of WI workersImage by LaDawna's pics via Flickr
Washington Times:

Wading back into the battle between Republican governors and public employee unions, President Obama on Monday told governors gathered at the White House that balancing state budgets will require shared sacrifice and that it doesn’t do “any good when public employees are denigrated or vilified.”

Mr. Obama used the shot, which seemed to be a veiled jab at Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker and other state executives trying to curb public union rights, to defend public workers, whom he said have already agreed to sacrifice additional benefits to help close budget shortfalls.

“Everybody should be prepared to give up something in order to solve our budget challenges,” Mr. Obama told members of the National Governors Association. “Many public employees in your respective states have already agreed to cuts … I don’t think it does anybody any good when public employees are denigrated or vilified, or their rights are infringed upon.”

...
I take it that he does not mean the union thugs should stop denigrating and vilifying Gov. Scott Walker who is being compared to Hitler and called all sorts of names by the protesters, many of whom are skipping work.

He also does not seem to recognize how the process of collective bargaining distorts the process and plays into the hands of the corrupt bargain between Democrats who are selling out taxpayers to repay the unions for electing them at all levels of government. This inherent conflict of interest needs to be addressed if government is to get a grip on its budget.

Either the President is being extremely cynical and disingenuous or he is just out of touch. I hope it is just the latter, but I would not bet the house on it.

Notice how inane the sign held by the protester above is.  Walker was just elected by a majority of voters in Wisconsin.  It is ridiculous to suggest that he  is a dictator, when he is asking the legislature to pass laws consistent with policies he favored during his election campaign.  The insult is gratuitous and makes no sense, but that is the kind of  "denigrated or vilified" response the unions have had and Obama is not criticizing them.
Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more