Why START now?

Bulava SLBMImage via Wikipedia
IBD:

...

Against this backdrop of a crazed nuclear regime, the Obama administration insists on the ratification of the New START Treaty during the current lame-duck session of Congress, a treaty that would limit our ability to deal with North Korea militarily.

The treaty limits each side to 700 deployed intercontinental ballistic missiles, submarine-launched ballistic missiles and heavy bombers. The Russians are already beneath the treaty limit of 700 launchers, and their economic condition does not facilitate a massive new buildup. We're not limiting their weapons, only ours.

...
Obama never really understood strategy or strategic weapons and his conduct on START and the North Koreans and Iranians suggest he has not grown in office. He thinks that since he is never going to use ours, that he is not hurting us by reducing them. He fails to see that the need for deterrence did not end with the cold war.
Related articles
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Should Republicans go ahead and add Supreme Court Justices to head off Democrats

Washington Post: Some Democrats eye adding more justices to the Supreme Court to change its ideological bent The once-remote idea has gained the attention of liberals angered by the GOP push to remake the federal courts. Probably the easy way to defeat this court-packing scheme is for Trump to propose doing the same thing now.  It would lead to Democrat denunciations and claims that it would be wrong, thereby blowing up any attempt by them in the unfortunate event of Democrats winning a presidential election.
Read more

29 % of companies say they are unlikely to keep insurance after Obamacare

Conn Carroll: A new survey of 368 midsize to large companies found that 29% of them are considering terminating their active employee health care plans when Obamacare is full implemented in 2014. Only 71% of employers surveyed said they did not expect to drop their health coverage, while 20% said they did not know and 9% said they were planning to exit. The latest survey, conducted by Towers Watson, echoes an ealier survey by McKinsey & Co. finding that 30% of private-sector employers were planning to drop their employee health insurance coverage by 2014. When the Congressional Budget Office crunched Obamacare's spending numbers, they estimated that only 7% of employees currently covered by employer-sponsored plans would lose their plans. ... This means the cost of the health care fiasco will be hundreds of billions more than estimated by the CBO and Congressional Democrat. It is also clear that Obama's pledge that you could keep your health care plan if you wanted t
Read more